Price increase coming soon!

00Days
00Hours
00Minutes
00Seconds
Secure your ticket
Skip to main content

News & Media

Africa’s critical minerals: The opportunity of a generation

peter pham
Tuesday, October 6, 2026

What's in this article

  1. a.Critical minerals become strategic assets
  2. b.Africa’s geopolitical moment
  3. c.From mine to manufacturing
  4. d.America’s reindustrialisation requires global partners
  5. e.Beyond the mine: building industrial ecosystems
  6. f.The investment opportunity for Africa
  7. g.Aligning investment with national security
  8. h.Africa’s opportunity is bigger than what it can export

For decades, mining projects were largely viewed through the lens of commodity supply and demand, operating in an increasingly globalised marketplace and governed by the relentless discipline of price. Today, national and economic security are increasingly challenging that logic. Mining projects are being assessed not only for their commercial returns, but also for their role in strengthening supply chains, industrial resilience and strategic autonomy.

The question is no longer simply whether a mineral can be produced competitively. Increasingly, governments and investors are asking where it is produced, who controls the supply chain, how secure that supply is, and whether the infrastructure exists to convert mineral resources into strategic industrial capacity.

That represents a profound change in the way mining is viewed - and creates a new strategic opening for Africa.

Critical minerals become strategic assets

The United States has increasingly identified certain metals and other materials as “critical minerals” - resources considered essential to economic or national security whose supply chains are vulnerable to disruption. The current US list encompasses 60 mineral commodities and elements. More recently, concerns over market concentration and dependence on a “single supplier outside the G7 and partner countries”, together with the use of “non-market policies and practices and economic coercion, including arbitrary export restrictions”, have underscored the vulnerability of critical-mineral supply chains.

This year, the United States and its G7 partners responded with a pledge to reduce those dependencies, including through quantifiable targets. The significance extends well beyond trade policy. Critical minerals are increasingly becoming a matter of strategic security - and governments are consequently placing greater emphasis on diversified supply, trusted partners and resilient value chains.

For mining companies, this changes the investment equation. Projects that may previously have been assessed primarily against commodity prices and operating costs are now also being evaluated for their geopolitical value and their ability to contribute to more secure supply chains.

Africa’s geopolitical moment

That geopolitical shift places Africa in an increasingly important position. The continent possesses an extraordinary geological endowment, with significant resources of minerals critical to energy, technology, infrastructure and defence industries. But Africa's opportunity extends well beyond simply supplying raw materials to global markets.

The continent can become an integral part of secure, integrated mine-to-manufacturing supply chains - connecting responsible resource development with processing, infrastructure, logistics and, ultimately, the advanced industries that underpin modern economies.

This is a crucial distinction.

If Africa remains primarily a source of unprocessed commodities, much of the economic and strategic value of its mineral endowment will continue to accrue elsewhere. If, however, African countries can capture more of the value chain through processing, infrastructure and industrial development, the geopolitical shift underway today could become a catalyst for broader economic transformation.

From mine to manufacturing

The next generation of African mining projects should therefore be viewed not simply as mines, but as potential anchors for industrial ecosystems. A mine requires roads, railways, ports, power and telecommunications. Processing requires reliable energy and logistics. Manufacturing requires skilled labour, technology, capital and access to markets. Developed strategically, these requirements can reinforce one another.

A railway built to move minerals can also connect agricultural producers and manufacturers to markets. A port developed to export mineral products can become a broader trade gateway. Power infrastructure built for a mine can support surrounding communities and industries. Processing capacity can create new businesses, skills and employment beyond the mine gate.

This is where Africa's opportunity becomes considerably larger than the commodity itself. The objective should not simply be to extract more tonnes. It should be to build more resilient regional economies around those tonnes.

America’s reindustrialisation requires global partners

For the United States, reindustrialisation requires reliable access to the materials that support defence, advanced manufacturing, energy and technology infrastructure. Despite deep partisan divisions in Washington, there is growing bipartisan recognition that US national security cannot depend solely on domestic production of the industrial inputs required by the modern economy. The answer is not simply to produce more at home. It is to build resilient international partnerships and diversify sources of supply. That creates a natural area of strategic alignment between the United States and resource-rich African countries.

Africa needs investment, infrastructure, technology and access to global markets. The United States and its industrial partners need diversified, reliable sources of critical minerals and the ability to develop supply chains that are less exposed to geopolitical disruption.

The opportunity lies in connecting those interests.

Beyond the mine: building industrial ecosystems

The most compelling opportunities will be those in which mineral projects are developed as part of broader industrial ecosystems rather than as standalone extractive operations. Railways, ports, power generation, processing facilities and manufacturing capacity can transform mineral resources into strategic assets while creating economic value within Africa.

This requires a different approach to investment.

Mining companies, governments, development-finance institutions and strategic investors need to look beyond the boundaries of individual projects and consider the infrastructure and industrial systems required to make entire mineral regions competitive. Regional infrastructure can be particularly important.

Many of Africa's most prospective deposits are located far from existing ports, railways and reliable power. Developing these assets in isolation can make projects commercially challenging. Developing them collectively, however, can create economies of scale and unlock multiple mineral and industrial opportunities. That is where public-private partnerships and strategic international investment can play an important role.

The investment opportunity for Africa

This creates a significant opportunity for African nations prepared to offer transparent investment frameworks, support responsible resource development and participate in regional infrastructure projects. The geopolitical environment is increasingly rewarding jurisdictions that can provide investors with predictability, regulatory clarity and reliable infrastructure. But capital will not flow simply because a country has attractive geology.

Investors will increasingly look at the entire ecosystem around a project: permitting, taxation, infrastructure, political stability, access to power, environmental standards, local partnerships and the ability to move products efficiently to international markets. African governments therefore have an opportunity to compete not only on the basis of their mineral resources, but on the quality of the investment environment they build around those resources.

The countries that can offer both world-class geology and world-class investment frameworks are likely to be best positioned to benefit from the emerging critical-minerals economy.

Aligning investment with national security

Ivanhoe Atlantic’s strategy is closely aligned with this emerging national-security architecture. We believe American-led investment in Africa can unlock world-class resources while creating durable economic partnerships, strengthening critical-mineral supply chains and supporting industrial development on both sides of the Atlantic. The objective should be mutually reinforcing.

For African countries, strategic investment can provide the capital, technology and infrastructure required to develop resources and capture more value locally. For the United States and its partners, investment can create diversified and resilient sources of critical minerals while strengthening relationships with countries that have the geological resources required by the next generation of industry.

For investors, the opportunity is to participate in projects positioned at the intersection of commercial returns, economic development and strategic supply-chain security. That alignment has the potential to create partnerships that endure well beyond individual commodity cycles.

Africa’s opportunity is bigger than what it can export

The global mining industry is entering a period in which geology and geopolitics are becoming increasingly intertwined. The critical-minerals race is changing the strategic value of mineral deposits. Supply-chain resilience is becoming as important as production costs. Infrastructure is increasingly viewed not simply as a cost of mining, but as an enabler of industrial development.

Africa sits at the intersection of all three trends. The continent has the resources the global economy needs. It also has the opportunity to determine how those resources are developed, processed and integrated into the industries of the future.

The strategic opportunity is therefore not simply about what Africa can export. It is about what Africa can help build.

AUTHOR: Ambassador (ret.) J. Peter Pham is Executive Chairman of Ivanhoe Atlantic. Previously, he served as the United States Special Envoy for the Great Lakes and Sahel Regions of Africa

Downstream Buyers
Investors
Market News
Industrialisation
Governance & Policy
Geopolitics
Critical & Strategic Minerals

Related articles

Articles
Wednesday, September 16, 2026

What does Dangote’s refinery mean for Africa’s mining ambitions?

The value of a resource can change dramatically when processing, capital and ownership move closer to the point of production.

Articles
Monday, August 31, 2026

Governments are becoming mining dealmakers in the race for critical minerals

Governments are moving deeper into the mining deal room, shifting from traditional lenders and regulators to investors, customers, price-setters and strategic partners as countries race to secure critical mineral supply chains.

Articles
Thursday, September 17, 2026

What does the BRICS summit mean for Africa’s mining value chains?

The BRICS summit has sharpened the race to secure critical minerals – but for Africa, the bigger opportunity is capturing more of the value created after extraction.