News & Media

For Africa’s mining leaders, the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi was less about securing another market for minerals than about reshaping where those minerals are processed, manufactured and monetised.

South Africa used the summit to push beneficiation, manufacturing, infrastructure and technology up the agenda, while the wider BRICS grouping called for more resilient critical-minerals supply chains and greater value addition in resource-rich economies.

The two-day summit, held on September 12 and 13 under India’s chairship, concluded with the New Delhi Declaration, which calls for critical-minerals supply chains that support “benefit sharing, value addition and economic diversification” in resource-rich countries. The message is increasingly clear: the strategic competition is moving from mineral supply to mineral value chains.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa put Africa’s position bluntly at the BRICS Business Forum:

“We cannot accept a future where Africa supplies the minerals on which the next generation of industries depends, while value addition and manufacturing take place elsewhere." He called for investment in “manufacturing and beneficiation, industrial technologies, energy systems, infrastructure and logistics”.

For mining companies, that changes the investment conversation. The question is no longer simply whether Africa can produce more copper, lithium, manganese, cobalt, graphite or rare earths. It is whether projects can be connected to the processing, refining and manufacturing capacity needed to capture more value from those resources.

Critical minerals become an industrial strategy

The New Delhi Declaration calls for critical-minerals supply chains that are “reliable, responsible, diversified, resilient, fair, sustainable, and just”. It also supports greater participation by emerging markets and developing economies in higher-value segments of global manufacturing and production through trade, investment, technology transfer and productive capacity.

That is significant for Africa.

The continent holds major resources of many minerals required for energy, transport and advanced manufacturing, yet much of the processing and downstream production remains concentrated elsewhere. The opportunity is therefore not simply to increase mining output. It is to build the industrial ecosystem around that output.

Ramaphosa argued that beneficiation should happen closer to the source of the mineral.

“To ensure inclusive growth in Africa and other regions of the world, beneficiation of minerals must take place at source.”

That proposition has major implications for project developers.

A new mine feeding an overseas processing plant generates one type of economic relationship. A mine linked to domestic or regional concentration, refining, precursor production or manufacturing creates a potentially much broader industrial footprint.

The latter, however, also requires substantially more capital, infrastructure, skills, technology and market access.

India brings manufacturing into the equation

The India-South Africa relationship illustrates the potential. South Africa brings mineral resources and an established mining sector. India brings significant manufacturing capacity, industrial demand and expertise in areas such as automotive production.

Ramaphosa said: “South Africa’s mineral wealth and India’s manufacturing capabilities create the basis for cooperation across critical mineral value chains.” He identified potential partnerships around new-energy vehicles, batteries and other products.

The opportunity is to connect African mineral supply with industrial capacity and end markets. But that connection will only work if the underlying economics work.

A battery-materials plant requires reliable electricity, water, transport, technical skills, chemical inputs and sufficient scale. A refinery requires similar foundations. Manufacturing adds another layer of requirements, from standards and supply chains to financing and market access.

The mine is therefore only the starting point.

China adds technology and industrial capacity

Chinese President Xi Jinping reinforced the manufacturing dimension of the BRICS agenda, calling for stronger industrial and supply-chain cooperation.

“China stands ready to assist fellow BRICS countries in building smart factories and developing standards and norms, and jointly promote manufacturing transformation and upgrading.” Xi also called for BRICS countries to safeguard “stable and smooth industrial and supply chains” and foster a “large integrated market”.

For Africa, the relevance extends beyond mineral exports. Processing technology, automation, digital systems, artificial intelligence and industrial engineering could become increasingly important components of partnerships between African resource producers and international companies.

The strategic question is whether those partnerships can build capabilities in Africa rather than simply connect African mines more efficiently to overseas processing hubs.

Modi highlights the supply-security opportunity

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi brought the supply-security dimension into sharper focus. “The weaponization of technology and critical minerals can hinder our shared progress.” His warning reflects the increasingly strategic role of critical minerals in energy, technology and manufacturing.

For African producers, the diversification of global supply chains creates an opportunity to attract investment into previously marginal or undeveloped resources. But investors will still demand competitive projects, predictable regulation, infrastructure and reliable routes to market.

That is where the BRICS agenda around trade, investment and infrastructure becomes important.

Infrastructure will determine what gets built

Africa cannot move from mine-to-port to mine-to-market without solving its infrastructure constraints.

Ramaphosa told Indian business leaders: “Investment in transport, logistics, ports, digital connectivity, smart cities, and industrial corridors is essential to trade and integration on the African continent.”

For mining, the equation is straightforward. A mine cannot feed a processing plant if rail capacity is inadequate. A refinery cannot compete without reliable and affordable power. A manufacturing facility cannot operate efficiently without dependable logistics and access to markets.

Infrastructure is therefore becoming part of the mineral investment proposition itself.

This strengthens the case for integrated projects that combine mineral development with rail, ports, power, water and industrial capacity. It also makes regional infrastructure corridors increasingly important to the future of African mineral value chains.

The investment test

The biggest question coming out of New Delhi is whether political ambition can translate into investable projects. The gap between announcing beneficiation and financing a refinery remains substantial. Downstream projects generally require higher upfront capital, specialist technology, longer development timelines and dependable access to energy and markets.

For governments, there is a balancing act between encouraging local value addition and maintaining the competitiveness required to attract mining and industrial investment. For mining companies, the challenge is equally practical: finding partners willing to share the capital and risk of moving further downstream.

Ramaphosa framed the challenge around execution:

“The question is no longer whether there is potential within BRICS, but whether we have the ambition, the instruments and the partnerships to convert this potential into economic value for our people.”

That is ultimately where the BRICS opportunity will be tested.

From mine-to-port to mine-to-market

The summit has reinforced a direction already emerging across Africa’s mining industry. The traditional model has focused on getting ore or concentrate from the mine to the port.

The emerging model is mine-to-market: connecting exploration and extraction with processing, refining, manufacturing, infrastructure, technology and end-user demand.

BRICS potentially brings together many of the ingredients required for that model – African mineral resources, international capital, manufacturing capacity, technology and large consumer markets.

But the commercial proposition must come first. The opportunity for Africa is not simply to supply more minerals into expanding BRICS economies. It is to use those mineral flows to build processing capacity, industrial capability, infrastructure and manufacturing ecosystems on the continent.

As Ramaphosa put it: “Companies must invest not only to access markets but to establish production facilities and develop local capabilities.”

That is the real significance of the BRICS summit for African mining.

The next phase will not be measured by declarations. It will be measured by **mines linked to processing plants, processing plants linked to manufacturers, and partnerships capable of turning Africa’s mineral endowment into lasting industrial value.