This was the message from CEO of Mine Rescue Services South Africa, Mannas Fourie, who used the high-profile Buffelsfontein zama zama incident to frame a shifting risk landscape for the global mining industry.

In an MITV interview at Mining Indaba 2026, Fourie positioned the Buffelsfontein rescue operation as a watershed moment, one that tested not only the limits of underground intervention, but also the industry’s moral and institutional frameworks.

A complex, high-stakes rescue

The incident, which unfolded at the Buffelsfontein mine near Stilfontein, involved hundreds of illegal miners trapped deep underground in abandoned workings. The operation ultimately saw:

• 246 individuals rescued alive
• Dozens of fatalities recovered after prolonged exposure to extreme underground conditions

Fourie described the operation as one of the most technically demanding undertaken by Mine Rescue Services South Africa, citing depths exceeding 1,200 metres, unstable shafts, and hazardous atmospheric conditions.
“This was not a conventional mining emergency,” he indicated. “It required us to operate in an environment with limited information, compromised infrastructure, and significant external pressure.”

Humanitarian imperative over legal status

A defining theme of Fourie’s remarks was the non-negotiable humanitarian mandate guiding mine rescue operations. The Buffelsfontein incident drew national attention not only for its scale, but for the legal and ethical tensions surrounding the rescue of illegal miners. Despite this, Fourie was unequivocal: Mine rescue does not distinguish between legal and illegal miners - only whether lives are at risk. The intervention proceeded under a court directive, highlighting the increasingly complex intersection between law enforcement, public safety, and humanitarian response in regions affected by illegal mining.

Redefining preparedness in a changing risk environment

At Mining Indaba 2026, Fourie argued that incidents like Buffelsfontein are no longer anomalies, but indicators of systemic risk evolution across Southern Africa’s mining landscape. Illegal mining, he noted, introduces a new category of emergency scenarios characterised by:

• Abandoned and poorly mapped underground networks
• Large, unregulated groups operating at depth
• Heightened safety, legal, and reputational risks for stakeholders

“This is a different operating environment,” he suggested. “Rescue teams must now prepare for scenarios that fall outside traditional mine design and planning assumptions.”

Technology as a force multiplier

Fourie also pointed to the growing role of specialised rescue technologies in enabling successful outcomes under extreme conditions. Equipment such as mobile rescue winders - capable of operating at ultra-deep levels - proved critical at Buffelsfontein, reinforcing the need for continued investment in:

• Real-time underground communication systems
• Remote sensing and environmental monitoring
• Advanced simulation-based training

The integration of these tools, he argued, is shifting mine rescue from a reactive function to a more predictive and strategically embedded capability.

Collaboration under scrutiny

The Buffelsfontein response required coordination across multiple stakeholders, including government authorities, the judiciary, local communities, and emergency services - often under intense public and media scrutiny. For Fourie, this underscored a broader industry lesson: Effective mine rescue cannot operate in silos.
Instead, he called for greater alignment between operators, regulators, and service providers, particularly in jurisdictions where illegal mining activity is prevalent.

From outlier to indicator

The central message emerging from Fourie’s engagement at Mining Indaba was clear: Buffelsfontein is not an isolated event - it is a signal. As mining operations extend deeper and socio-economic pressures drive informal extraction, the industry must adapt to a future where emergency response is:

• More complex
• More visible
• More ethically scrutinised

In this context, Fourie’s reflections point to a redefinition of mine rescue, not simply as a last line of defence, but as a critical pillar of modern, responsible mining. At Mining Indaba 2026, Mannas Fourie grounded his insights in one of the most defining recent rescue operations in South Africa - the Buffelsfontein zama zama incident - using it as a real-world case study of how mine rescue is evolving.

Extreme rescue under real-world pressure

Fourie reflected directly on the Buffelsfontein disaster, where hundreds of illegal miners were trapped deep underground in an abandoned shaft near Stilfontein. The operation ultimately:

• Rescued 246 miners alive
• Recovered dozens of bodies (at least 78 deceased) after weeks of dire conditions underground 

He highlighted the technical intensity of the operation - working at depths of over 1,200 metres, under extreme heat, darkness, and unstable conditions, with highly specialised equipment like mobile rescue winders.

A humanitarian, not legal, mandate

A central message he reinforced at Indaba, drawn directly from Buffelsfontein, was that: Mine rescue does not distinguish between legal and illegal miners - only whether lives are at risk.
This principle was tested in the incident, which involved:

• A court-ordered intervention
• Significant public scrutiny
• Ethical tension between enforcement and humanitarian response

Despite the illegal status of the miners, Mine Rescue Services proceeded because of the life-saving imperative. 
Lessons from Buffelsfontein for the global industry In his MITV interview, Fourie framed the incident as a turning point for how the industry should think about rescue:

1. Preparedness for “non-traditional” emergencies

Illegal mining is now a systemic risk across Southern Africa. Rescue teams must be ready for:

• Abandoned shafts
• Unmapped underground workings
• Large numbers of trapped individuals

2. Technology as a critical enabler

He pointed to innovations like the Mobile Rescue Winder, capable of operating at depths exceeding 3,000 metres, as essential in making such rescues possible.

3. Operating under scrutiny and complexity

Buffelsfontein unfolded under:

• Media attention
• Legal pressure
• Community tension

This requires not just technical skill, but leadership in high-stakes, emotionally charged environments.

4. Collaboration across stakeholders

The rescue only proceeded after coordination between:

• Courts
• Gouvernement
• Rescue teams
• Communautés

Reinforcing his broader point: mine safety and rescue cannot operate in silos.

The bigger message

Fourie’s core takeaway at Mining Indaba 2026 was that incidents like Buffelsfontein are no longer outliers, they are signals of a changing risk landscape in mining. Modern mine rescue must be deeper, faster, more technologically advanced - and ethically grounded. By anchoring his remarks in Buffelsfontein, he effectively shifted the conversation from theory to reality - showing what “extreme mine rescue” looks like when lives, legality, and logistics collide underground. The Mobile Rescue Winder used by Mine Rescue Services South Africa is one of the most important - and least understood - pieces of modern mining safety equipment. In simple terms, it’s a fully mobile, self-contained hoisting system designed to rescue people from deep underground when a mine’s primary shaft system fails.